By jsimonds | April 27, 2007 - 2:09 pm - Posted in history, military

uss new york.jpg

USS New York

It was built with 24 tons of scrap steel from the World Trade Center.

It is the fifth in a new class of warship - designed for missions that include special operations against terrorists. It will carry a crew of 360 sailors and 700 combat-ready Marines to be delivered ashore by helicopters and assault craft.

Steel from the World Trade Center was melted down in a foundry in Amite, LA to cast the ship’s bow section. When it was poured into the molds on Sept. 9, 2003, “those big rough steelworkers treated it with total reverence,” recalled Navy Capt. Kevin Wensing, who was there. “It was a spiritual moment for everybody there.”

Junior Chavers, foundry operations manager, said that when the trade center steel first arrived, he touched it with his hand and the “hair on my neck stood up.” “It had a big meaning to it for all of us,” he said. “They knocked us down. They can’t keep us down. We’re going to be back.”

The ship’s motto? “Never Forget”

By jsimonds | April 24, 2007 - 2:30 pm - Posted in SaaS, analyst, developerWorks

IBM launched community tools known as Spaces (myspace for businesses) at Web 2.0 last week. Rawn Shaw has a summary and preview of the tools and a webcast on his blog.

The PartnerWorld site has the webcast here.

DeveloperWorks is providing this toolset for likeminded communities to work with each other via many social networking tools that we’ve come to know and love.

There are 12 spaces including PHP, Ajax, Mashups, SOA, gamers, linux security, and…………………….Software as a Service known as SaaSpace.com. As I understand it, the SaaS community will be able to communicate both publicly and privately for all things SaaS and partners. There are a number of partner spaces already set up.

We’ve briefed a number of analysts who have had varying reactions. On the positve side, we’ve been told that this provides an environment where partners can communicate and engage on their own terms and that we may be on to something. Less positive included what’s the incentive for them to do this?This is a positive step for both partners and developers to have community and web 2.0 tools to work. It also is a step in the right direction as a SaaS and community player for us.

By jsimonds | - 10:43 am - Posted in racing

ferrari_logo.png

You don’t even have to ask folks if they know what company this is, or what product they make. When I read the Ferrari biography, it stated that the name Ferrari was akin to Smith when Enzo was growing up.

Ferrari, The Company is 60 years old, happy birthday. The timing of the company founding puts it at WWII, a tough time for Europe.

Instantly the mind conjures images and dreams of a marvelous red machine roaring down the Auto Strade in the Tuscan hills between Florence and Pisa, a lovely lady, signora bella in Italian, beside you. Or you’re in an F1 getting the checkered flag just like Michael Schumacher has done. More than likely, though, you and I are staring at one parked on the street, as it passes you on an expressway, or gleaming on display at an auto show.”

People (ok mostly guys) can tell you how cool their car is, but this is the trump card.

Let’s see:
Low rider Neon with spinners, loud exhaust, dice and fur? nope Ferrari is cooler.

Prius? Sorry, it’s the Ferrari

Corvette? nope Ferrari.

Jaguar? Ferrari

Lotus? Ferrari

Anything American? Ferrari

Anything Japanese? Ferrari

BMW, Mercedes, Audi? Ferrari

Porsche? Toss up as this is about car religion.

Not only are the cars great, the look and sound ooze with testosterone.

The greatest drivers in the world have all driven Ferrari. Fangio, Ascari, Andretti, Prost and of course…Michael Schumacher. How would you like to drive this to work?

schumi.jpg

You go bear hunting with the proper tool.

weatherby bear.JPG

So it is when you are dealing with different constituencies, in this case the analysts and the press. This is actually a lengthy and deep discussion when you understand the differences, so I’ll break this up and speak to it from time to time. Unfortunately, the people most likely to read this are the choir, not the intended audience, but if you wish to chime in on your experiences, I’ll see that it gets to the right audience.

First, I want to address the company side of the equation. If one doesn’t understand that they are fundamentally different, you have already penalized your effort to succeed. There are cases where there might be a constriction requiring the same team to handle both. Perhaps the company is so small that communications is a one man job. That person had better be talented. I did this for a company in the 80’s and learned through the school of hard knocks and mistakes.

There are cases where using an agency is an option, albeit rarely a good one. Agencies are designed for dealing with the press, with analysts being an afterthought. Having also worked at an agency, I observed that most don’t do the press side as effective as they could. I’ve heard from analysts who uniformly detest an agency as the front man or communications vehicle. Microsoft is an example I’ll call out with WaggEd handling it in the past (I believe this to have changed). We could routinely count this as a victory in our court knowing they were handling A/R for an engagement (I did multiple joint announcements with Microsoft, all being similar to the cold war, all better handled by IBM or the company I was working for).

This points to hiring the right people to do the job of analyst relations. While communications skills, personality and the ability to nurture a relationship are common between them, plugging a PR person into an AR position, then asking them to deal with the other constituency without training is a mistake. Big disclaimer here, I went from years (17) of PR work to analyst relations, but I went to training, understood the differences and was mentored. I also was a programmer, ran technical support and was company spokesperson for mass storage, tape backup modems, RAID and networking. I’ve spoken to hundreds of reporters and analysts from the hot seat.

Understanding that Analysts and Press are different and require different handling is just the start. I’ll write on this further, but suffice it to say the depth of understanding of the product, service or offering you represent requires a far deeper understanding on the analyst side. Pitching a story to a reporter requires a script, 20 seconds of intro that will hook the reporter and a good sense of timing are what you need to get a story written.For AR, you don’t have to be the patent owner for the product, but being able to discuss the technical implications, the market conditions for acceptance, competency of the competition and many other items are vital to being able to differentiate yourself from being a secretary to setting up meetings. This is quite different than pitching a story to the beat reporter and forwarding a release. Again, no disrespect to the PR side, I’ve done both, but it is a different set of skills.

There are use different levels of detail, different timing’s and other considerations relevant to the audience. An analyst isn’t on deadline to write a story. They care far more about what it is, why it matters, how it competes, the business value (all over time) and many other aspects. One has to appeal to what the analyst cares about and their field of interest. Taking some time to know who they are by, get this, reading their blogs helps one to understand if they care or not.You will be held accountable for things said. If you go back to the comment (all over time), if you commit to having something in 6 months, the analyst briefing in 6 months will have the question, “did you release the product?” as an issue.

Why is this important? While I’ll get into it in a later post, it’s about time value. I ask the question, what was the leading story 3 years ago, three months ago, three weeks ago? Most can’t remember. An analyst opinion or report while not timeless, keeps a company accountable for at least a year.

I’ll close with the onus being on the company to staff the position of analyst relations with a person who is capable, trained as to why this is important and understands that dealing with analysts is different than dealing with the press.

Next time, I think I’ll talk about the differences between reporters and analysts.

By jsimonds | - 2:17 pm - Posted in geek, technology

My inner geek comes out again

star trek shield1.jpg

I like to use this shield on some people I know.  Maybe this would detour the Iranians from nuclear holocost?

desktop-catapultt.jpg

A desktop USB catapult.  Good for cubicle warfare.

160 gbtoshibaflash.jpg

16GB of chip storage,  imagine that for a phone, iPod or combination?
103 inch plasma tv.jpg

And for the Coup de Grace, a 103 inch plasma TV.

doolittle_raid.jpg

After morale was decimated by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor, we had to do something to lift our spirits in WWII and show our fighting spirit.  Attacking Japan on their home soil, unthinkable to Japanese military command, was accomplished.

Taking off in horrendous sea’s, B-25’s which were too big for a carrier take off, flew 600+ miles to Tokyo and dropped bombs.  War hero James Doolitte led the raid that made history.

Little real damage was done when compared to the fire bombing later in the war, but it did show some testicular fortitude.  The attack was spotted by the Japanese and they knew it was coming.  The pilots knew that they did not have enough fuel to return and would have to ditch.  They had the chance to back out without shame, but all flew the mission.

History records the rest of the war.  Although December 7th, 1941 forced us into a war, April 18th 1942 was the day the USA started winning it.

By jsimonds | April 11, 2007 - 8:38 am - Posted in blogging, history, technology

I recently read two somewhat related stories. The 21 technology flops, and the 50 best Tech Products.

It was interesting to know that I’ve lived through both lists. For example, I used to manage a Personal Computer Store and sold PCjr’s, and they came back. The Apple Newton is the reason so many iPaQ’s and Blackberrys are around today, how could they be flops? The Net PC may still be viable, if we can get enough available bandwidth so that we don’t nap when uploading or downloading. The Apple Lisa was a piece of Krap with a Capitol K. How do I know? I sold them and a higher percentage came back than the PCjr. For $10,000, it wasn’t even near worth it, but it did have the technology that became the Macintosh.

OS/2 is on the list….ouch. Technically, a better OS than Windows, but IBM was out marketed by Microsoft and Windoze is the de facto standard. I often include this same comment with token ring and SNA, better technology, but out marketed.

Want to vote on the worst, here’s the link. Here is the list.

Apple Lisa

Apple Newton

Digital audio tape

DIVX

Dot-bombs

Dreamcast

E-books

IBM PCjr.

Internet currency

Iridium

Microsoft Bob

The Net PC

NeXT

OS/2

The paperless office

Push technology

QUBE

Smart appliances

Speech recognition

Virtual reality

Web TV

Other

Now the best from the 50 best Tech Products by PC World.

I’m not sure I sign up for the same order they rank them (Netscape #1?) but again, I sold thousands of Apple II’s. In fact, for one month, my computer store lead the nation in sales of Apple II’s. Of particular note is Lotus 1-2-3. I was a Visicalc giant when this product came out at Comdex Vegas in 1983, I remember that clearly as I show my age. I created macro’s hundreds of coding lines long, automating procedures that the DP department (IBM 4341 mainframes).

The Hayes smartmodem, of which I worked with the 300 baud model for a long time (also aging me). And of course the iPod, perhaps my top pick if only for relieving boredom on airplanes.

I’ll spare commentary on every product, but I do recognize the Atari VCX/2600, the Macintosh which I sold thousands of, tetris which my daughter played thousands of hours on. The Compaq DeskPro 386, again I sold thousands of these and it was the best clone, and the start of the real clone wars (sorry Star Wars).

Here are one’s I disagree with. Windows 95 (the only real good OS from Microsoft was DOS), the Blackberry (electronic leash for too many people).

Anyway, here is the whole list:

  1. Netscape Navigator (1994)
  2. Apple II (1977)
  3. TiVo HDR110 (1999)
  4. Napster (1999)
  5. Lotus 1-2-3 for DOS (1983)
  6. Apple iPod (2001)
  7. Hayes Smartmodem (1981)
  8. Motorola StarTAC (1996)
  9. WordPerfect 5.1 (1989)
  10. Tetris (1985)
  11. Adobe Photoshop 3.0 (1994)
  12. IBM ThinkPad 700C (1992)
  13. Atari VCS/2600 (1977)
  14. Apple Macintosh Plus (1986)
  15. RIM BlackBerry 857 (2000)
  16. 3dfx Voodoo3 (1999)
  17. Canon Digital Elph S100 (2000)
  18. Palm Pilot 1000 (1996)
  19. id Software Doom (1993)
  20. Microsoft Windows 95 (1995)
  21. Apple iTunes 4 (2003)
  22. Nintendo Game Boy (1989)
  23. Iomega Zip Drive (1994)
  24. Spybot Search & Destroy (2000)
  25. Compaq Deskpro 386 (1986)
  26. CompuServe (1982)
  27. Blizzard World of Warcraft (2004)
  28. Aldus PageMaker (1985)
  29. HP LaserJet 4L (1993)
  30. Apple Mac OS X (2001)
  31. Nintendo Entertainment System (1985)
  32. Eudora (1988)
  33. Sony Handycam DCR-VX1000 (1995)
  34. Apple Airport Base Station (1999)
  35. Brøderbund The Print Shop (1984)
  36. McAfee VirusScan (1990)
  37. Commodore Amiga 1000 (1985)
  38. ChipSoft TurboTax (1985)
  39. Mirabilis ICQ (1996)
  40. Creative Labs Sound Blaster 16 (1992)
  41. Apple HyperCard (1987)
  42. Epson MX-80 (1980)
  43. Central Point Software PC Tools (1985)
  44. Canon EOS Digital Rebel (2003)
  45. Red Hat Linux (1994)
  46. Adaptec Easy CD Creator (1996)
  47. PC-Talk (1982)
  48. Sony Mavica MVC-FD5 (1997)
  49. Microsoft Excel (1985)
  50. Northgate OmniKey Ultra (1987)

I might as well add the best technology blogs while I’m at it.

Update:  Top tech picks of 1982 from modern mechanics, including the trash-80 and the IBM-PC.

By jsimonds | April 9, 2007 - 3:54 pm - Posted in humor

I will say the spam filter on Wordpress is pretty good. There are a few that get by each day, but I manually delete them. I’m clicking along at a few hundred a day, and when I clean it out (more and more frequently), it’s usually 12 thousand or so.

While most are usually from a false email address, I can pretty much bet that if it’s from gmail or hotmail, it’s headed to the delete pile.

So let’s get into my deficiancies that I apparently have. The spam that I receive will clear up all of these problems I didn’t know I suffered from.

Obviously, I’m paying too much for car insurance.

My manhood must need to be enhanced, and I’m performing for less than 36 hours at a time.

I’m under medicated, from vicoden to antibiotics. I must be depressed too.

I have the wrong ringtone for my cellphone, or not enough of them.

Apparently, I’m at risk for rape and need to view the video, and speaking of videos there is an abundance of pr0n out there.

It seems that I don’t gamble on line enough (in my case at all), and that I should be buying a rolex, real or fake.

I didn’t know I have a sleeping problem, but I need drugs that will help me with that.

There seems to be a chance that I’m at risk for lupus.

I wonder how I ever made it through the day without these helpful offerings to solve all of my problems?

According to Intelligen/Lighthouse, IBM Software Group has been ranked by AP analysts as having the most effective Analyst Relations programme in the region for two years now. In addition, this is part of an overall survey which also found the overall IBM Anayst Relations team as the most effective in the region for three consecutive years.

Analysts were asked to rate vendors on six attributes in relation to their analyst relations programs: resourcing of the program; how candid the vendor is; how well vendors understand the analyst’s coverage areas; how proactive their AR team is; how responsive they are to information requests; and how well they provide access to experts and senior executives.

I posted the Software Group win last year and it was quite an interesting pissing contest ensued. The bad part was it happened mostly in email and didn’t get to the comments section.

Congratulations to the A/R team in Asia Pacific. The bad news is the person doing the work of 40+ people in the US, Junaidah (last name removed for privacy) is leaving for a partner. That leaves some pretty big shoes to fill. We’ll miss her and her good work there. I hope we have a partner announcement with her new company.

By jsimonds | April 5, 2007 - 3:42 pm - Posted in geek, history, star trek

scotty.jpg

One of my favorite shows ever was Star Trek. The chemistry of Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty laid the groundwork for the other series which live on as shows with the most passionate viewers (geeks like me). The Sci-Fi phenomena can be traced to Star Trek as much as any other show. They had wireless communicaitons, bluetooth devices, laser weapons, all of which were portrayed on TV before they exisisted in real life.

Sadly, we’ve seen the passing of both McCoy and James Doohan, or Scotty. It seems only fitting that his ashes should be sent to space, the final frontier. Here is the link to the Space.com article.

“Scotty” will go up to his final resting ground with Gordon Cooper, pioneer of the NASA space program and was one of the original 7 Mercury astronauts. They’ll join Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, who’s remains were shot into space previously.

God speed Scotty, Live long and prosper.

Update:  Here is a link to the actual launch and ceremony where his remains were launched into space.